8. Commander.js CLI Framework
Status: Accepted Date: 2025-01-28 Deciders: Development Team
Context
We need a consistent approach for building CLI tools across the monorepo. Multiple scripts and tools require argument parsing, help generation, and command organization.
Requirements:
- Type-safe argument parsing
- Automatic help generation
- Subcommand support for complex tools
- Consistent UX across all CLI tools
- Good TypeScript integration
Alternatives considered:
- Native Node.js argument parsing
- Yargs
- Custom argument parsing
Decision
Use Commander.js for all CLI tools.
Consequences
Positive:
- Consistent CLI UX across all tools
- Reduced boilerplate for argument parsing
- Type safety for command arguments
- Professional help output
- Easy to add new commands and options
- Excellent TypeScript integration with strong typing
- Clean, declarative API for defining commands
- Automatic help generation with consistent formatting
- Mature ecosystem with good documentation
Negative:
- Additional dependency for simple scripts
- Learning curve for team members unfamiliar with Commander.js
- Slight overhead compared to native parsing
Mitigation:
- Use Commander.js for complex CLI tools only
- Simple one-off scripts can use native argument parsing
- Document patterns and examples for team reference